Beyond inputs: How market linkages and quality infrastructure can address crop disease in Rwanda's horticulture sector

Policy brief Firms, Trade and Sustainable Growth

Crop disease is a major but often overlooked constraint on horticulture productivity in Rwanda, with smallholders losing substantial shares of potential yields. Evidence suggests that value chain integration and well-designed certification schemes are more effective than standalone subsidies in improving disease management and productivity.

  • Crop disease is one of the most significant and under-addressed constraints on horticulture productivity in Rwanda, with many smallholders losing half or more of their potential yields annually. 
  • Conventional policy responses—such as input subsidies and public extension—are necessary but insufficient on their own; they fail to resolve the underlying incentive failures that drive poor disease management. 
  • The structure of markets matters: farmers who are integrated into demanding value chains adopt better practices, not primarily because they receive more inputs, but because commercial relationships create enforceable incentives and reliable information flows. 
  • Certification schemes, when well-designed, can align private incentives with public productivity goals at scale. 
  • A coordinated package of reforms—spanning certification, buyer–supplier linkage facilitation, and value chain coordination—offers the highest return on public investment.